Grimstock’s Archives

Reconstructing the Spanner Operation 1983 to 1990

contact: grimstock@grimstock66.com

The Spannermen—–Background Information—— Archive 1

Latest from the Blog

Should the argument about fake search warrants now apparently shift to verbal abuse and insult of mostly deceased men with the claim from 21.30 of the video, (*see below) that the 16 Spannermen were all “naive and ignorant”, and had allowed/invited the entry to their homes in 1987 without a search warrant; This cult-appeaser’s statement on camera is intended to both damage the Spannermen’s reputation whilst also attempting to throw attention away from the fact that over 100 gay men had apparently also been slaughtered in the operation…….

No warrants? ………Then since there had been no incidental arrests made, nor valid warrants used, nor stolen goods involved, nor suspects detained nor sought on any of the premises, nor any other lawful reason to obtain search and seizure powers, the police were merely as uninvited ransacking gatecrashers at the homes, and not welcome (and additionally subject to a restriction to Common Law [as religious police – see at 8.10 of the video] on that particular occasion, – i.e: 19th Century law), and as such had no powers under the prevailing circumstances to carry out any search and seizure on the various premises targeted, ……………………..

The purpose and intention of the Spannermen being added to the existing ritual as “victims” had never been to treat them fairly, or in accordance with any rules,…………………………..

**I therefore have good reason to believe that documentation relating to the Spanner Case and Operation may possibly have already been tampered with and falsified, and additionally or alternatively, that the stated facts (whether agreed or not) of the written judgement relating to the raids on the 16 Spannermen as it now stands, bears little resemblance to the evidence presented in Court in 1990.

Continue reading<

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.


Truth does not need to be validated by ignorance”. – Jordan Maxwell

It may indeed be hard for some to begin to assimilate the truth; in that not only have you been lied to on a monumental scale, but that you are also governed by a criminal network that makes organised crime seem like a Sunday school vicar’s tea party by comparison. Some prior understanding of the depths of depravity and corruption that abound amongst those whom are entrusted with your best interests would be required before you may seek to enter those depths at which everything may seem totally incomprehensible; because it usually is, unless you are aware of the next layer of depravity and corruption which relies upon those incomprehensible facts.
Familiarity with the facts, (whilst being able to identify a cover story) even when seemingly incomprehensible, may stand you in good stead for when you eventually enter the next depth of the rabbit hole, and your moment of comprehension comes the day the penny drops, when another piece of the jigsaw unexpectedly presents itself.
So do not worry if you find yourself seeking the answer to a dozen or more questions when faced with one item of information, as it is entirely normal where the real truth has been purposely withheld as secret for reasons that you would possibly and preferably not even wish to know about.
The world is not as you have been led to believe.

ABOUT : Reconstructing The Spanner Operation 1983 to 1990

Welcome! …………I investigate and document my research findings into Operation Spanner under the name of Grimstock. My research began with publicly available information in 1983, and was augmented the following year when minor acquaintances started to noticeably become involved. I had then been tasked by my conscience years later to initially research the 60+ suicides and the other early deaths arising from the operation when I first became aware of those deaths in the 1990’s, and after having already periodically tried to piece together the twists and turns of the operation from 1983 onwards, when I had first been informed of the nationwide police raids on gay men, and small columns in the gay press of the time 1983/84 had referred to these raids. (The name “Spanner” had only been attributed to the operation from 1987 onwards – 4 years after the operation commenced). However, the more I learned from the various snippets of information coming my way, coupled with the ever-disappearing “official” statistics/data and the false official narrative {which from my personal experience during the operation, I already knew to be massively incorrect at first sight}, the more I realised that something was definitely not quite right; with additionally having both known and met several of the Spannermen throughout the spanner procedures during the 1980’s and early ’90’s {with one of them being a close and highly-valued friend, colleague and business partner of mine for more than thirty years, and his good friend, another Spannerman who had been visiting him for many years} ; I had also met the stellar Roland on several occasions during this time; the information I already had was thus beckoning and compelling me to try and solve the riddle.

Prior to 1987, the operation (by the Obscene Publications Branch of The Metropolitan Police in London- (thus having nationwide jurisdiction), had been nameless,[as far as the public and the police seemed to be concerned] but casually referred to in a 1987 magazine (possibly the “Woman’s Own”, from 31st October 1987) interview with Margaret Thatcher, as her “Christian Family Values” campaign, “forefronted by her choice for Head of the 0PB; Michael Hames” – [a Church of England official and also policeman previously {allegedly} operating in Ealing, West London prior to 1983], but in reality seeking snuff videos/child porn and raiding gay men for several years. His whereabouts during the 1980’s are often hidden/covered through the misinformation of dates relating to his various appointments. The revelations were not within the transcript of the interview, but in the accompanying notes and photographs. Nevertheless, the operation had already been ongoing prior to her second term in office, and had been pre-scheduled and drawn up (through occult numerology) on behalf of the crown. In that article it was clearly stated that Michael Hames had been appointed by/from the Church, meaning that this was indeed the Witchfinder appointment, as there was only the one MET appointment allowed from the Church.

Another revelatory article came to my attention prior to the autumn of 1996 in a very popular London weekly magazine, “Time Out” on the penultimate page (either the reverse of the back page or the last one before the back cover sometime prior to autumn 1996, (though I am not sure of the year, but I believe 1996 to be most likely), and was very basic, but expressing the author’s surprise that the historical Witchfinder General appointment (being said to be) “still operating” despite being outdated, together with a basic explanation of that posting. It is also claimed (at 8.10 in this video) that Christian fundamentalists were being appointed to run the OPB from 1970’s onward. However, and as perfectly correct as that may be, it does not also mention that the squad had always – as morality police- (and via different titles over the years) been under the helm of the Church of England. (Please also refer to Operation Spanner Dissected under “Witchfinder General”). Common Law was their jurisdiction.

I proceeded to try and amalgamate the many pieces of the jig-saw puzzle I now had before me, and base my research upon these items of information, and how they might possibly fit together in a way that would neither cause any to conflict with another, nor negate the need for any singular piece, despite any possibly missing pieces. Much to my surprise and amazement, and after years of failure, my trial of the application of occult numerology together with the known statistics fitted like a glove for this purpose, and seemingly answered many questions that would have otherwise remained unanswered; leaving no known primary basic data nor information about the operation unaccounted for. This was the turning point for my investigation, and that swiftly brought other previously unrealised data with additional possibilities and the various codes used during Spanner to the research, which on occasion appear to have perhaps been surprisingly accurate in my opinion, including the rendition of a closing seal/curse, and the related number three which had until then completely stumped my work – as had the 66 ritual hexcraft pathway of which I already had most of the data, but without my realising the purpose, if any, of those statistics running through the operation. It was an entirely unexpected turn in my research, and one on which I was at the time almost completely ill-prepared for, and consequently bringing with it much additional time and research to my already somewhat impeded investigation of the operation.

The following reconstruction is therefore based on that research data, my opinions, and deductions made where relevance would interconnect perfectly with what I already had and understood ; and where numbers chosen for that task suggest other pieces of the puzzle may potentially piece together amicably. I do not believe my work represents the operation in entirety, but I believe I may have covered the framework on which the operation was based. It may be advantageous, and also possibly necessary to familiarise yourself with the data covered in “Operation Spanner Dissected” prior to tackling the information available in this blog, should you not already have done that, as knowledge of that data is mostly taken for granted in this article, which both builds and supersedes upon that earlier data in certain areas.

Short Summary of the Spanner Operation

For those who lost their lives; may they now rest in peace – the secret and lies about their untimely demise has now – at long last – been exposed.

(Judge Mr James Rant QC pontificated on the Spanner case with the following remark):  “Much has been said about individual liberty and the rights people have to do what they want with their own bodies, but the courts must draw the line between what is acceptable in a civilised society and what is not. In this case, the practices clearly lie on the wrong side of that line.”

So – what was “acceptable” in a civilised society?

This information comprises deduced and hidden sacrificial ritual/ Saturn worship/ 66 ritual hexcraft pathway 1983 to 1989: with Crown end lock closure/ seal/ curse 1989 to 1990.

My findings are as follows: Operation Spanner had been a 7 to 8 year long pre-scheduled secret society police initiation, and Crown sacrificial ritual (based on occult numerology and Saturn worship) by way of a sacrificial cull of gay men by Church and State under the official banner of proclaimed “Christian Family Values”, using the camouflage and later addition of the Spannermen case and the cover of the false official story surrounding their arrests, which signalled the predetermined end of the [official] police operations with code 9 in September 1989 [9/1989 =9x9x9x9=6561 (=666 )/ 9+9+9+9 = 36/3×6(=666)/ = 666+666= closed/complete/ 9999 itself signifies completion but with unfinished business] whereupon the Crown closure(code 3) of the operation/ritual took over for completion. The 9 jailings had been a relatively small part of the operation, but absolutely essential to the success of the ritual, which I believe finally ended with being sealed and signed-off by the Old Bailey in December 1990. That there had to be 9 jailed had therefore been decided prior to 1983, {and possibly prior to 1893} as the whole operation/ritual/tally had been pre-scheduled- leaving only the victims (chosen targets) and “crimes”(excuses for the jailings) to be chosen later. The numerical sequences involved in the ritual had, in my opinion, been both too important and too obvious to have been overlooked prior to the 1980’s, however, the possibility does exist that the details of the ritual may possibly have been contemporary to pre-1983 planning.

I thoroughly expect the date of composition of the statistics and re-scheduling of the ritual for the 1980’s would have been related to / by the previous occasion this particular sequence of ritual numbers [777 {21},3,6,9] – resulting in part or full reduction from the adding of the numbers contained within each of the years – had been available and enacted upon – 1893 to 1899* are in my opinion the most recent dates which give an identical sequence as and prior to the Spanner ritual. I believe that the sentencing statistics [including the 369 months total handed down and the order and “twinning” of some of the Spannermen sentences at the Old Bailey] had also been chosen or previously set prior to any victims or crimes being identified or selected in order for the closure of the ritual to be conducted according to plan. (* see final paragraph in “parts” section below – I do not believe this had been the first of the 3,6,9 rituals, but a recurring one)

The prosecution and trial had therefore been carefully arranged and manipulated to provide the required statistics. Similarly, the initial CPS charging in the case had been deliberately drawn up to ensure that the Old Bailey would be involved, as their work would be closure and seal/lock and curse on the ritual – according to the codes laid down for this highly important Crown ritual, so only the most trusted and favourable secret society judges could therefore possibly be entrusted and acquainted with the details; in order to secretly render and ensure the outcome precisely to plan, and to maintain secrecy, in addition to the broadening of the interpretation of the OAPA 1861 act.

That both the statistics and the timing of the start of this Crown ritual (operation) had been drawn up and commenced based on the full reduction of the numbers within the dates 1+9+8+3 = 21 = 2+1= 3, and similarly with 1986 and 1989, thus exonerates Margaret Thatcher, and any of her policies during the 1980’s from any blame for the operation, as every twist and turn of the operation had already been pre-scheduled, and could not be interfered with, – although I do suspect she had personally chosen the Spannermen as targets for the jailing statistics of the ritual after she had been unofficially informed of the Manchester/Bryn Alyn corruption and whistleblowing, and that the legal, professional, and personal threats made against the whistleblower by telephone to his home by a Mr. Greenwood, “Assistant Principal Director” of Manchester Childrens’ Services in November 1983 in order to try and convince him to retract his report on Bryn Alyn had been to no avail (and the matter then, perhaps through secret society networking, passed to Manchester Police in November 1983) – the corruption later found to be involving the procurement of children from mostly the Liverpool and Manchester areas in that instance being pimped out by Manchester Children’s Services to John Allen‘s child prostitution business, but only one of many such set-ups throughout the country involving John Allen (please also refer to “Operational Timeline” in “Operation Spanner Dissected”), – with such use of children later found by Andrea Davison to include ritualistic child porn and snuff movies (and indirectly connected to tech transfer of biological weapons data to Iraq) being produced for or by ex-Angolan mercenaries in North Wales contracted to Intel services, and who were protected by local police. ( By way of interest, Thatcher’s son Mark had also later been financially involved with mercenaries in Africa).

The operation came from the Crown itself, and not one of their vichy politicians, with two-thirds of the deaths of the victims (66) being allotted to Saturn(code 6), and one third (33) allotted to the whims of the crown(code 3) agents, (in that instance then supposedly loosely based on wishes of the victims in some cases, but in a hateful, extreme and fatal manner) and concluding prior to the lock/seal deaths.

The Various Parts of this 369 Crown Initiation and Sacrificial Ritual:

There were only 4 parts of the official Operation Spanner; and I believe 4 of the unofficial one, giving 8 parts in total. 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8=36, 3+6=9 – 3, 6, 9 operation codes.

1) 1983 to 1986 code 6 {Saturn}-covert raids-[partly official but later removed from official story] on mostly advertisers and responders to gay magazines [“Gay Galaxy”, and possibly others] involving over 620 raids – allegedly to have been most of the time seeking “snuff movies”, of which no defendants or charges were forthcoming for the CPS charging or trial in 1989. I believe the total by end of 1987 had been 666 after the 16 Spannermen/other raids had been carried out, as 650 may signify Crown power over commoners/ House of Commons (of 650 members) as the 16 Spannermen had to be later reduced to 15 for the required sentencing closure of the ritual, indicating these earlier totals of 650 +16 = 666 had only been necessary for the main rituals/raids prior to sentencing. The 666 achievement also signalled the end of the 66 ritual hexcraft pathway initiation test/task.

2) In the background to this part, I believe 66 {canonical} victims from 1983 to 1986 lost their lives (alleged suicides). I believe that the alleged suicides may mostly be a cover for hidden charges of sodomy and summary execution under Common law, in order for ritual sacrifice to be carried out in worship of Saturn, and the hope of accumulation of wealth in return; in that respect, I suspect that many of the victims may have been single businessmen, or had assets available; so a search for papers or any Will present within the victim’s address could have been disguised by the dating and executions, rather than search warrants; I believe that mostly dating from contact magazines had been used as a ploy to arrange the executions/meetings at the homes of the accused for a supposed session or initial meet-up (*see below). I do realise that victims may have been required to put themselves into compromising situations or positions especially illustrating their evidential and perceived wrongdoing ready for the envisaged session/meeting in order to swiftly establish/ maintain the edge of surprise, disbelief and control without any form of discourse necessary or permitted in accordance with summary execution [and terrorise possibly with arrest, handcuffing and either gagging and hanging/strangulation or other means at the very outset], and thus hasten the procedure, even to perhaps create some more time available for the ritual and/or training of initiates present. Somewhere during this encounter, semi-convincing suicide notes were either produced in many of the cases, or alternatively introduced. I believe fakery rather than coercion would have likely been used in that respect. Correct signatures and sign-off’s of the believed executed men would additionally/normally have been available inside their homes, if not from correspondence with the gay contact magazine box number involved. So we have additionally 2 sections of the identifiable 6, 66, 666 ritual hexcraft pathway in this code 6 / 1+2 parts of the operation: Saturn = 6, sacrificial deaths = 66. (6 years and the 666 raids also by September, 1989.(9999)

*Although I had originally believed the official line of the “suicide” victims being found to have died “following” a police raid, I later realised that this would most likely not be the case at all, and that the possibility of neighbours (for instance) seeing a team of men visit or leave the address twice and thus raising suspicion would not have been chanced. So if that is correct, then the executions would have been dated via the contact magazine for the initial visit, (thus negating any need for search warrants) and then perhaps also requiring the mention of earlier police raid in the suicide notes to avoid the connection being realised by detection, in order to support the belief of later suicide.

I have no idea of the time taken for any procedures that may have taken place, though I do not believe that opportunities would have been overlooked where money could be earned for the crown; not least through acquisition of any estate, and/or anything that goes with it, and in accordance with the purpose of the “pathway”.

Further, other charges in Operation Spanner had been publicised following the arrests/charges, and there had been no mention of the 66 other than collectively as a total statistic of 60+, so there had been no apparent reasons for them to commit suicide as they had seemingly not been officially charged through the normal channels; and as I believe had been referred to as “potential defendants” in “The Dirty Squad”, page 165 (together with the 16 Spannermen), following their deaths. One of the Spannermen had stated/confirmed to me personally at the time, and following a preliminary court hearing in London in 1989 or 1990, that none of the 66 men mentioned in court had been known by any of them after the 66 had been attached to the case, thus indicating the “nationwide ring of men” had certainly been fabricated for the court/trial; and also that the businessman visitor (who is pictured on the front drive of the property in Operation Spanner Dissected) who had been present at the Harford address in 1983 during the Bryn Alyn security trespassing on the property in the early hours (and had been known by one Spannerman), had apparently not been named, although the circumstances of his early 1984 death were exactly identical to the others. There had been no mention of 66 potential defendants in any of the newspaper reports on charging of the Spannermen in September 1989, as far as I am aware of. Some (additional) deaths throughout the operation may have been rejected for ritual purposes. The Spannermen raids had been deferred until the code 6 sacrifices had all been completed in 1986.

So the 100+ total of early deaths (by December 1990), including the 60+ and other “unsolved murders” would have therefore appeared – even if ongoing at the time {perhaps intimated by the +} – unconnected to the operation, thus negating any need for the severely difficult task of collating of any totals of {later and unrelated} deaths. There had been no post-operation aftercare for the Spannermen, so it is additionally unlikely that any concern would have been shown for any “later” misfortune of previously questioned men uninvolved with the case. The deaths had therefore apparently been connected, and collated as part of the operation, and had not occurred later, but during or resulting from, the police presence and contact; the “connection”. The effectiveness of the ritual was entirely dependent upon the integrity of these statistics and the manner of the deaths involved as initial factors of those actions, and possibly explains the Intel involvement, which also appears to have provided security for the ritual and locations used, some of which had appeared to receive more than momentary attention. The only “concerns” the authorities had shown for anyone involved in the operation are sufficiently illustrated by the slaughter of over 100 men, the jailing of 9 innocent men, and the curse intended for all gay men and anyone who may try to interfere.

3-official with false late 1987 start) December 1986 to September 1989 code 9 {man/the beast} – The Spannermen case (shelved for 3 years until completion of the code 6 culling operation, and (as I estimate), the possibility of the completion of 650 raids by that time. These planned nationwide raids eventually involving up to 16 men – {this is a questionable but possibly necessary ritual statistic – refer also to parts 1, 4, and 7} with the raid in Harford, Dyfed coming third [following Pontypridd, and Bristol], and involving the second Spannerman in April, 1987. Search warrants had been issued on the basis of “snuff movies”, and/or “SM movies”, and the Spannermen were charged with Common law “assaults” under the OAPA 1861 at the time of the raids – 1986/87, with Michael Hames informing the accused that they were “going to go to prison” for assaults. This eventually resulted in full media coverage upon arrest and CPS charging two years later in September 1989, with the release of names, addresses, occupations, and involved charges including false claims and lies, and at the core, centred around SM devotee visitors to, and a resident/owner of the {corruption} whistleblower/ reporter’s address with additional men unrelated to the known Spannermen videos. Sanctions were placed on the men during the raids to prevent them contacting others.

Intel surveillance activity {1983 to 1991} at the Harford address shall remain redacted for the time being, but armed intrusion with keys at the secluded empty house whilst the owner had been in Wandsworth prison had also occurred in March 1991, though to my knowledge nothing had been disturbed or taken, – well, apart from the intruder that is.

(Please refer to part 2 above for the falsely claimed “nationwide ring of men”, and to Operation Spanner Dissected (link below) – and the “operational timeline” in that blog for details of the whistleblowing recommending “full monitoring of all Bryn Alyn operations be undertaken by relevant authorities” ). Selected pieces of that report may also be found in “Lost in Care” (The Waterhouse Report) in Chapter 21, paragraphs 21.113 to 21.115. From those Waterhouse paragraphs, trashing of that Bryn Alyn report is again in evidence in the denial of easily provable facts confirming : 1) That the report had indeed been circulated to all parties involved, and that: 2) The complaint of corruption had been sent to 10 Downing Street (Thatcher) and not the Home Office, who were notified by Downing Street. That the Waterhouse Report was just a whitewash of lies, deceit and manipulation is now common knowledge amongst investigators, and this is merely one example of that interference. Operation Pallial had been a little better, but still secret society interference/manipulation in my opinion was around over 50%, so a slight improvement is evident. Not enough, however, and lacking the discretion employed in Waterhouse; for example, in a certain (secret court) case it is believed that prosecution witness statements reserved only for the jury had apparently been altered (to include sentences at the end of a paragraph/statement that were both fake and highly detrimental to the perceived integrity of the witness involved).

(Please also refer toOperation Spanner Dissectedfor more info or links on the related John Allen and his child porn empire/child trafficking/boy brothels for the elite, alleged blackmail and related arson; Margaret Thatcher and corruption in child care involving North Wales and Manchester authorities; Andrea Davison and her Macur Report statement of North Wales Intel involvement with Arms to Iraq and highly-priced snuff and child porn for the elite; Scallywag magazine; Bryn Alyn and the missing or copied elite child porn videos; the Westminster paedophile ring; the Witchfinder General appointment; “Gay Galaxy” and other gay contact magazines; and “Outrages” by Naomi Wolf). Also refer to Waterhouse report / Operation Pallial background (well, the official version, at least). In all honesty I can certainly say that the last line of “terrible allegations” would also seem to depict the government stance on the matter over the years, ever since the public exposure of those allegations by Scallywag magazine in the 1990’s.(Scroll down that page for unredacted full and printable text).

4 – official – code 9 or code 3 = 1+1+1) and possibly additional part: {later claimed and publicised raids between 1987 and 1989 with possibly 111 raids or interviews to complete a 777 figure of total raids /{my calculation – please also refer to Mark Passio video below for 9 = hidden 666 = 18/1+8=9 }/ cautions under code 9 [perhaps in mainly the Manchester area]. However the jury is still out on this part. These raids, if true, were not part of the cull, and may possibly be partly comprised of contacts of the 16, but involved only Manchester Police, so exist either as subterfuge and/or curse whether carried out or not. The fact that the Witchfinder had not been involved with these raids indicates that the 666 raids (end of the 6,66,666 ritual hexcraft pathway) had already been achieved/completed prior to this part. The 777 code had been used at the start and finish, and a third 777 (666 + 111 =777) is indeed possible, as the code 777/777/777 had been used by the Old Bailey twice, indicating completion and closure of the 777 ritual with 99 deaths contained within. (639963 = 63 = 9×7, 99 = 3×33, 63 = 9×7). (please refer to Comment 401 in Archives for further information). The 639963 is achieved by full reduction of all the original sentences in months in stated and delivered order, which included the twinning of some. The total sentencing in months handed out (369) had been the operation codes. So if this part is indeed relevant, that relevance only relates to additional statistics, and not the main rituals. The 111 represents a hexagram curse, in addition to the total deaths + jailings, and the presiding lock/curse deaths (1+1+1).

5) In the background to this part, and I believe also code 3 {royalty/crown} victims (believed to be 33 in total number by September,1989/+3 by end April,1990) all met a savage and extremely violent, but not swift, early death, as ritual sacrifice, in various private or secluded meet-up settings. The Spannermen charges had been issued at the official end of the police operation; September 1989 (9999), with the trial and sentencing (+9) by the Crown during code 3 (1989 to 1990). I believe the code 3 victims had been mostly selected/chosen/contacted/dated from gay magazines other than Gay Galaxy, or from personal knowledge. The initiates were seemingly tested for initiative from this part. Sudden deaths, as one example, would have been rejected for ritual purposes, as only intense and drawn-out suffering would have been acceptable prior to the death of the victims.

6) I believe the 66 Ritual Hexcraft Pathway had been undertaken for success, wealth, and status/initiation(from 1983 to/by 1989). Successful undertaking of the Pathway is claimed to be the highest achievement a layman may attain within a particular secret society.

7- official) code 9 Spannermen trial and sentencing. {see also below} A plethora of information has already been available on this subject for many years. Only 15 men were required for the sentencing statistics, so one of the 16 Spannermen had to be dropped {Alan Oversby in this case) from the main sentencing to comply with the laid-out ritual closure statistics. (Please refer to comment 401 for sentencing statistics and the comment relating to sentencing details).

8) I believe there had been code 3 -September 1989 to December 1990 Crown closure, sealing,(lock) on the ritual and a curse on the victims, placed through the Spannermen sentencing statistically, with 3 (code 3) violent but not swift sacrificial deaths as a presiding seal/lock and curse, [with the deaths possibly preceding the trial being booked in at the Old Bailey] and possibly a continuation of code 9 to the end 1990.(as the code at September,1989 (9999) indicates task completed, but with unfinished business). With 9 Spannermen incarcerations of code 9 added= 99999 – signifies both unfinished business now completed, and “end”. [please refer to comments 401/ 402 for further details]. I believe the presiding seal and lock /curse may possibly also apply to all actions and statistics of the operation in order to punish tampering with any results. This part may possibly have involved chosen initiates or selected teams from the code 3 killings under supervision.(Please refer to comment 401 for sentencing statistics and the comment relating to sentencing details).

I also believe the “West London Murders” (September 1989 to April 1990) may possibly be connected to the code 3 lock/seal deaths,-mainly due to the start /finish dates and the manner of the deaths. Naturally, there had been other possibly unconnected suspected or actual murders within this time frame – not least of relevance being the death of Carole Kasir in June,1990 who perhaps knew too much/ and was said to have had a list of Westminster paedophile visitors to her Elm Guest House. However the West London Murders [1989-1990] seem to tick all the boxes for relevance, with the killing of Michael Boothe by six men {which I personally believe may have been the last of the Spanner cull/killings, and occurring on Hames’s previous “patch”, Ealing} perhaps also appearing as a unique demonstration to initiates present of the ease of the task involved, as once Michael’s foot had been broken, (possibly by stomping on the foot once it had been placed/dragged over the edge of a step) he could do nothing but remain on the floor, so only boots/shoes had then been required to complete the attack. (Since I first established and publicised this possible connection to Spanner in 2018 on the David Icke thread, there has already been at least one (believed to be possibly false) article about the circumstances surrounding the killing of Michael Boothe published earlier this year – 2020, which apparently attempts to contradict Michael’s own statement made prior to his death). This informs me that I may indeed be on the right track here. It may also be noteworthy at this point to mention the following Wiki entry found under “England and Wales” section:

“Michael Boothe, an actor who was gay, died in April 1990 in west London, beaten to death by a gang of up to six men close to a public lavatory.[120] The police said he had been the victim of “an extraordinarily severe beating, of a merciless and savage nature”. He managed to give a description of his attackers before he died, and a reward of £15,000 was offered, but no one was caught,[119] and the crime remains unsolved. The police review identified institutional homophobia within the Metropolitan Police as a factor.[121]

I believe most executions had been undertaken by selected teams, and certainly at times if not fully, using gay contact magazine adverts and replies/ photos/ videos as a method of covertly choosing/ contacting and dating intended victims. It is certainly noted in one book that the police had acted proactively during the magazine searches (i.e: placed or replied to adverts in the magazines). The “magazine searches” would apply to the periods where victims were being sought; that is from start of 1983 to around April 1990, with possibly a “halfway” short 1 year break following the “initiations”[prior to December 1986 to end of December 1987] to allow the Spannermen raids to be undertaken by Michael Hames, and his OPB teams, prior to the majority of the code 3 killings, of which some may perhaps appear to be loosely based on the chosen wishes of the victims {pre-arranged or requested/suggested role play – albeit turning into anything but play, with a hateful and overtly extreme/ fatal manner for the victims upon meeting not one person, but a team instead} – and perhaps relating to the number 101, and a test of initiative for the policemen as far as the ritual was involved. Should the number 101 be related to these killings, then it leaves a singular and unconnected 1 in order to achieve the believed 102 minimum total deaths.

With the Hexcraft Pathway (6,66,666) running through codes 6 and 9 of the operation/ritual, the consecutive parts were in the enacted order of 6,9,3. However, there was another concurrently-running part to code 9 [+code 6 ?] of the operation I believe – code 3, as the unofficial deaths during code 9 I believe to be more related to the code 3; in which event both 6 and 9[3] victims deaths appear subjected to the power of the number 11 – (code 6=66 victims, code 3=33(by September 1989), which is a more feasible conclusion, (but I shall leave that up to you to decide on); The number 11 also relates to initiation, so it fits well. It is also claimed that the operation also involved 11 provincial forces : https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/11931638.15-charged-after-operation-spanner/

Both the total victims deaths(in addition to the 9 Spannermen), and also the three corpses from code 3(lock and curse) are represented statistically as 111, indicating a hexagram curse, with (assumed) total Witchfinder raids of 666, gives a figure of 777, the code seemingly used at the very start and end of the operation that indicates sacrifice/rebirth among others; 1983= 1+9+8+3= 21= 3×7= 777 =start/ 666+111=777 finish. If correct, this would also indicate the ritual began anytime from the start of 1983. We already know that the operation was certainly underway from March/April 1983 onwards due to previously seen documentation, so it all fits. The three 7s are also apparent from the sentencing codes used on closure of the ritual in December 1990 at the 0ld Bailey. [please refer to Part 4 above, and to comments 401/ 402 in Archives for further details]

I do not expect details of the rituals or cull, – other than a tally of the total statistics [now hidden] – to be recorded anywhere. Neither do I personally believe that attitudes of the 1980’s towards gay men were totally to blame for the cull per se; although discussions concerning the target group may possibly have been undertaken as an option prior to the start date; but rather that the use of gay men [among others] for ritual sacrifice procedures had indeed been a long-established practice. The sequences of occult numerology of the 3,6,9 dates relevance, coupled with the operation codes alone implies that the ritual had certainly been planned long before the 1980’s too. The smooth running of the operation, and the efficacy of the cover-up would also suggest a well-travelled road. [Ritual sacrifice has been ongoing since pagan times, except it is well-hidden by Crown and secret societies these days]. It is also mentioned at 54.30 in the Arizona Wilder interview below that the number of ritual sacrifices being undertaken were increased from the early 1980’s on, suggesting that any sort of option to forego a massive 3,6,9 ritual may not have been on the table at the time.{nor indeed at any time in my opinion}.

My earlier research into this operation

(A) “Operation Spanner, Michael Hames, The Dirty Squad” from Cathy Fox. (comments made only) [Michael Hames is also known by others since 2007 as a cult member and satanist in the RAINS list, in addition to the Witchfinder General from 1983 to 1989 through my own work.] . R.A.I.N.S. list entry on Michael Hames: – [scroll down to around 2/3 down the page at 08.07.07] “MICHAEL HAMES – 08.07.07 Former Detective Superintendent with New Scotland Yard (NSY) Obscene Publications Unit, is in group but only expected to attend important ceremonies. Friendly with JLF. (Was involved in Operation Spanner. Appeared in several TV programmes, Dispatches “Beyond Belief” (1992) Brass Eye’s “Paedogeddon” (2001) & Dark Side of Porn’s “Does Snuff Exist?” (2006).”

(B) “The Story behind Operation Spanner and The Puritans” hosted by David Icke.com – This was my main research result thread from 2017. (now closed)

(C) “Operation Spanner Dissected” – where I have provided a quick summary of the operation, but without many details of the rituals- hosted by Cathy Fox. Much of the information may be found in the two pages of comments and links below the article.

Since there are many links to my comments from the David Icke research thread(B) – from both of the above Cathy Fox blogs for various comments and information which cannot now be viewed, I will now repost important ones here on this blog, starting with the most recent and going back in time so that the comments may now be read.

In order to locate the link identified with the David Icke.com thread comment, please go to the very end of the link I posted in the Cathy Fox comment sections, where you will see, for example: “postcount=303” or whatever number is relevant for the comment. That is the comment number, so you can come here, and look up “303” where you may eventually find the comment (updated where/if necessary). If there is no number; then either the info or video referred to is not a comment as such, and may be no longer available; or it may alternatively be a comment on here that I posted where the number has been lost (in which case I will post the number when/if known). I hope that is straightforward enough for you, and wish you good luck in delving into my old comments! Drop me an email if you have any questions or problems. I shall update with new (old) comments periodically, as I progress through that list. If there is a comment that you wish to see urgently, then please let me know. I have all the comments but not the numbers, so it may be some time before many of these may be identified.

DISCLAIMER, Notes and Tribute


Please note that all information and data presented within these pages has been compiled accumulatively from personal research and knowledge/ known facts/ trusted and knowledgeable sources/ given references/ personal deduction and opinion, and through that means provides a considered reconstruction of Operation Spanner from both given and deduced/withheld data. It is therefore the duty of all readers to apportion the value of any given data or expressed opinions presented according to their own research – and on the understanding that much relevant data and information has been removed from the public arena in addition to that always remaining withheld from public display.

All data, information and expressed opinions contained within this presentation represent the culmination of 37 years of my observations, personal knowledge and research into the operation, and have been provided on these pages as personal opinion for information only, and although being provided as truthfully and honestly as possible, is neither intended, and should not be interpreted herein on it’s own merit as evidential nor legal argument; nor should any given data, expressed opinion or any deduction made of withheld data therefore be construed as guaranteed, nor qualified as fully accurate; although accuracy on the whole is certainly considered personally to be well in excess of that currently available in articles and material related to the examined subject matters involved, without even considering the multitude intended to divert, deceive, or misinform you. It would be an understatement to say that the public have been misled for many years.

It should also be noted that apart from the exceptions of my limited personal knowledge and all personal opinions and deductions I may have made,(particularly with missing statistics or codings used); there is no other data or information used in any of the above presentations that was not – to a lesser or greater degree – publicly available at various times from 1983 onwards.

The real story behind Operation Spanner is perhaps not what you may have been led to believe, and I hope that my Spanner reconstruction, however uninformed, incomplete or lacking in certain areas, may help you to achieve both a better and basic understanding of the operation on the whole, and also help to provide you with some answers as to why the underlying truth has been hidden from you for many, and possibly hundreds of years.

For a good start on understanding the secrecy of 19th century deaths involving gay men, please also refer to “Outrages” by Naomi Wolf (pre-owned or original version only; and not the ones being released from October, 2020) ; and as to why the furore over her exposure of the deaths from so many years ago of those men convicted/executed for sodomy may be so relevant, I have touched on in “Operation Spanner Dissected“, on page 2- “newer comments”. See also: “Naomi Wolf to have book pulped over her claims UK executed dozens of gay men”

However, I do make my apologies in advance for any misdirections I may have made during this research whilst being hampered to some degree by having to sift through mis-/dis-/ and mal-information, and any failings on my part to confirm or consider data/statistics due to previously retracted and/or superimposed and misleading information on the subject matters involved.

Notwithstanding the somewhat disconcerting and unusually extreme lack of transparency involving the basic general information relating to both the “operation” and resulting statistics in all but the Spanner court case, [thereby potentially leading to errors of judgement and misdirection with any subsequent research], I do not believe there to be any self-drawn statistics nor information herein that may err, differ, or indeed appear too far in extremity from those or that originally withheld. It naturally follows that with the intricacies of the Spanner case excepted; neither would I be surprised should there be further facets to the operation which I may have overlooked or have no knowledge of.


1) Where any information may conflict with my earlier postings, the later comment data supersedes that which came earlier due to updating of the ongoing work at the time.

2) It should also be noted that where Common Law is referred to in the above articles only relates to cherry-picked Common Law both as incorporated into Statute Law, and interpreted for, or by a Crown or Statute Law Court ( = contractual corporate law intended for navigable waters), and bears little relation to the Common Law of the people (Natural Law) under a Common Law Court ( = law of the land).

3) The whole case, decision and operation was based on monumental levels of fraud, deceit and lies, and requires overturning NOW before the effects of that detrimental judgement is allowed to permeate into justification for the ongoing genocide of the entire human race.

The Valued Contribution of the Cathy Fox Blog on Child Abuse

Finally, and last but not least, I should also like to express my most sincere and eternal gratitude to the most wonderful and lovely Cathy Fox, a lady who is in my mind worthy of the highest honour in her never-ending pursuit of justice for the present and historic multitudes of abused children everywhere, and for her patience, support and valued assistance throughout my earlier research in helping me bring this matter to the attention of others before it was all lost into the sands of time, and for finding the time in amongst her busy schedules to both host and assist in the most cordial and amiable ways. There will always be a special place in my heart for that – I am truly thankful to her!


September, 2020